Related: gnucius, resume, _thesis

AGNU is "Lord AGNUcius".

The word 'Lord' in Old English is "hlaf weard" which translates literally to "loaf warden" or "bread guard".  Bread is a vital source.  Lord also means "owner".  In these senses I use the title to indicate my desire to guard bread from capitalist profiteers by using regular property ownership and the GNU General Public Law to create true Source Freedom.

'AGNUcius' is AG as in "agriculture" and NU as in "nuit" or "nut" - being the primordial creative force of "nat"ure and also has the tone of "new" as in "fresh harvest" ~ the regenerative refreshing fire of life itself - whether as the reincarnation/resurrection of the SUN through it's daily and yearly cycles, or as the biological perpetuation of genetics for physical salvation and eternal life.  The word may also be divided as "A" "GNU" - with "cius" meaning "a follower of" just as Saint IGNUcius before me.

===Other Names
BreadGuard (hlaf weard), fungi (mycoremediator), Jerome Schubkegel Windsor, Ownut, Patrick Anderson, Patrick Todd Anderson Henry (PTAH), patware, SourceLord, SOLOMON (SOL-OM-ON is my Mormon temple name, while SOL is Latin for SUN, OM is Hindu for SUN, and ON is Egyptian (Coptic) for SUN), StaMint (Patriarch Lamiaceae), usur.

===Spaces I occupy:,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

====Lists and Lurks:,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

My .emacs is in
My resume lists some of my computing skills.

Adopted at birth from San Mateo, CA.
Raised on a farm in Monteview, Idaho.
Went on a religious mission for the Mormons.
Married and mixed to copy my genetics.
Recovered from Mormonism and some other brain bacteria.
Uncovered why ecology and the economy are at odds, and generalized the GNU GPL to solve this problem for physical sources.


When Consumers invest and co-own the Means of Production, the product is not sold and so price == costs and profit is undefined.

This is easier than it may seem if you consider we, as consumers, already pay all of the costs of production anyway .. AND we pay profit because we pay late and are not the owners.

Crowd-Funding is opening this

Use-value production is possible

 system of trade needs a self-inflicted 'governor' - a negative-feedback loop - to allow the steam-engine of production to operate without the explosive danger caused when power is concentrated.

Much like a float and valve controlling water level, we would benefit from treating Price above Post as the Payer's Investment.

Profit measures the Payer's lack of ownership in the Sources of Production.  A Consumer will pay a Price above Cost when he does not have sufficient ownership in the Means of Production because he is *dependent* upon those current owners.

This imbalance can be incrementally corrected by treating that overpayment as the payer's investment in the growth of that organization - so that Capital is no longer 'accumulated' into the hands of the few, but is transparently 'distributed' back to the very person who paid it as a deed of property co-ownership in more Physical Sources needed for that type of product.  It becomes that consumer's investment in his own future.

This causes Profit to approach zero (as Price approaches Cost) and control to be move to the hands of those willing to work instead of being centralized into the hands the payees who would otherwise treat Profit as a reward for themselves.

Treating Profit as a reward for the current owners is a positive-feedback loop which concentrates property into the hands of those who already have more ownership than they can use directly (as proven by the fact they are selling the Product instead of using it for themselves).  This makes the rich richer, as these established agents receive even *more* control while leaving late-comers in the cold - even though it is the Payers of Profit who funded the growth of that organization.

Treating Profit as an Investment from the Payer is a negative-feedback against over-accumulation - allowing growth that is both sufficient (according to the amount the consumer is willing to overpay) and auto-leveling (because Profit approaches zero as each consumer gains sufficient ownership in Physical Sources).

The owners of an Avocado tree must pay for all the Costs of that production, including any Wages for work they do not do themselves, but Profit does not even enter the equation because the fruit is not sold at the end of the season since it is already the property of those who will use it.